В статье рассмотрено влияние фактора утомления на мотивацию к занятиям физическим воспитание
студентов ВУЗов. Стойкость (инерционность) установки, определяющая меру работоспособности студента-
спортсмена, существенно зависит от лежащих в ее основании мотивов. Конфликт между социальными и
биологическими мотивами-побуждениями, как переоценка значимости мотивов цели и мотивов отдыха, как сознание
невозможности выполнения прежней задачи является психологическим звеном регуляции самомотивации студента
к регулярным занятиям физическим воспитанием.
У статті розглянуто вплив чинника втоми на мотивацію до занять фізичним вихованням студентів
ВНЗ. Стійкість (інерційність) установки, як визначальна міру працездатності студента-спортсмена, істотно
залежить від її мотивів. Конфлікт між соціальними і біологічними мотивами-спонуканнями, як переоцінка значущості
мотивів мети і мотивів відпочинку, як усвідомлення неможливості виконання попередньої задачі є психологічною
ланкою регуляції самомотивації студента до регулярних занять фізичним вихованням.
The article
considers the influence of the factor of fatigue motivation in physical education of university students. Resistance (inertia)
installation, which determines the measure of efficiency of the student-athlete, essentially depends on its underlying motives. The
conflict between the social and biological motives-motives, as the revaluation of the significance of the motives and reasons for
vacation purpose, consciousness cannot perform the same task is a psychological link in the regulation of student self-motivation
to regular physical education classes. Since the action is an act of meeting a specific need, it is important to know the factors
influencing satisfaction (satiety) needs and the extinction of motivation and thus determine the resistance (inertia) of the
installation. It should be noted that the concept of "saturation of needs" and "extinction of motivation" is often used
synonymously, as the saturation of demand and the rate of extinction is accompanied by motives to its satisfaction.
Nevertheless, it is a different concept, and the difference between them is particularly clearly when we are dealing with so-called
higher, socially determined needs of acting in a complex chain of arbitrary action. Satisfaction or saturation of such a need may
be called the process of approximation of results of steps toward the ultimate goal. Therefore, the degree of saturation is
determined by a measure consistency of results and target action. But the extinction of intentions to achieve the goal may be the
case when the need (goal) remains unsatisfied. This can be either the result of occurrence of extreme adversity to achieve this
goal, or the consequence of the emergence of other, more urgent needs that involves some form of activity that is incompatible
with the former.
